炎上まとめwiki - 利用者の投稿記録 [ja]

Exercise Dependence And Muscle Dysmorphia In Novice And Experienced Female Bodybuilders

2025-09-03T22:40:06Z

VeolaOverlock: ページの作成:「 Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Authors' contribution: BDH (study concept and design, analysis and interpretation of data, study s…」

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Authors' contribution: BDH (study concept and design, analysis and interpretation of data, study supervision); DD (data collection); KW (data collection); MB (analysis and interpretation of data; statistical analysis). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Background and aims: Extensive research has shown that male bodybuilders are at high risk for exercise dependence, but few studies have measured these variables in female bodybuilders. Prior research has postulated that muscular dysmorphia was more prevalent in men than women, but several qualitative studies of female bodybuilders have indicated that female bodybuilders show the same body image concerns. Only one study has compared female bodybuilders with control recreational female lifters on eating behaviors, body image, shape pre-occupation, body dissatisfaction, and steroid use. The purpose of this study was to compare exercise dependence and muscle dysmorphia measures between groups of female weight lifters. Methods: Seventy-four female lifters were classified into three lifting types (26 expert bodybuilders, 10 or more competitions; 29 novice bodybuilders, 3 or less competitions; and 19 fitness lifters, at least 6 months prior lifting) who each completed a demographic questionnaire, the Exercise Dependence Scale (EDS), the Drive for Thinness scale (DFT) of the Eating Disorder Inventory-2, the Bodybuilding Dependence Scale (BDS), and the Muscle Dysmorphia Inventory (MDI). Results: Female bodybuilders scored higher than fitness lifters for EDS Total, BDS Training and Social Dependence, and on Supplement Use, Dietary Behavior, Exercise Dependence, and Size Symmetry scales of the MDI. Discussion and conclusions: Female bodybuilders seem to be more at risk for exercise dependence and muscle dysmorphia symptoms than female recreational weight lifters. Although medical practitioners agree that the majority of the population in western societies would benefit from more regular exercise as part of a healthier lifestyle, a small percentage of individuals may develop an obsessive approach that can be damaging physiologically, psychologically and socially. [https://www.buildland.co.uk/product-category/products/building-supplies-diy/trade-ladders/ buildland.co.uk] Researchers and clinicians have recently reviewed the decades of emerging literature on excessive exercise in weight lifters, Prime Boosts Pills and some have concluded that the behaviors are part of an obsessive-compulsive disorder diagnosis (e.g., Pope, Phillips & Olivardia, 2000), while others suggest that the symptoms are part of a body dysmorphia/body image disorder diagnosis (e.g., Lantz, Rhea & Mayhew, 2001; McCreary & Sasse, 2000), and still others have sought to differentiate it from a primary eating disorder (e.g., Hausenblas & Symons Downs, 2002). More recently, Berczik et al. 2012) have argued forcefully that excessive exercise is a type of behavioral addiction. Unfortunately, almost all of the research that has been reviewed to date on addictive anaerobic exercise behavior (Hale & Smith, 2012; Tod & Lavallee, 2010) has involved male bodybuilding and weightlifting samples. Whereas most western women seem to score high on the Drive for Thinness scale (DFT; Garner's (1991) Eating Disorder Inventory-2) and yearn to be thin and toned (Thompson, Heinberg, Altabe & Tantleff-Dunn, 1999), men in the last three decades are showing increasing scores in the drive for muscularity (e.g., Prime Boosts McCreary and Sasse's (2000) Drive for Muscularity Scale). One of these components, exercise dependence (ED), has been defined as "a craving for leisure time physical activity that results in uncontrollable excessive exercise behavior and that manifests in physiological symptoms (e.g., tolerance, withdrawal) and/or psychological symptoms (e.g., anxiety, depression)" (Hausenblas & Symons Downs, 2002, p. 90). It has also been measured by the Exercise Dependence Scale (EDS; Symons Downs, Hausenblas & Nigg, 2004). In the bodybuilding realm, Smith, Hale and Collins (1998) also created and validated the Bodybuilding Dependence Scale (BDS). Leone, Sedory and Gray (2005) postulated that MD was more prevalent in men than women, but several qualitative studies of female bodybuilders (Bolin, 1992; Guthrie & Castelnuovo, 1992; Klein, 1986, 1992) have stated that female bodybuilders show the same body image concerns, motivation for muscularity, and workout behaviors as males. While extensive reviews of quantitative studies have shown that male bodybuilders are at high risk for ED (Hale & Smith, 2012; Smith & Hale, 2011) and may also suffer from MD (Tod & Lavallee, 2010), few quantitative designs (Smith & Hale, 2004; Goldfield, 2009) have measured these variables in female bodybuilders. Goldfield (2009) was one of the few studies to compare 20 female bodybuilders with recreational female lifters on eating behaviors, body image, shape pre-occupation, body dissatisfaction, and steroid use. He reported that bodybuilders scored higher on the Bulimia subscale, Drive for Bulk scale (Blouin & Goldfield, 1995), and Drive for Tone scale (Goldfield, 2009). More recently Hale, Roth, DeLong and Briggs (2010) found that male bodybuilders and power lifters were significantly higher than fitness lifters on EDS Total, seven EDS-R scales, and the three BDS scales. No study to date has compared measures of MD and ED between different groups of female weight lifters. Although the estimates of bodybuilders suffering from ED and [https://reparatur.it/index.php?title=Benutzer:MaryellenRohr libido booster] MD may be small in western populations, the study of ED and [https://live-nine9.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=106036 libido booster] MD in female weight lifters is warranted. This study hypothesized that female bodybuilders would score significantly higher in ED, MD (Hale & Smith, 2012; Smith & Hale, 2011; Tod & Lavallee, 2010), and lower in DFT (Goldfield, 2009) than female fitness lifters.

What s The Most Fun You Can Have For 20 000

2025-08-09T12:47:35Z

VeolaOverlock: ページの作成:「 The rapidly improved fortunes of the Ford Mustang from 1982 through 1986 mirrored those of Ford Motor Company itself. After teetering on the financial brink, [https:…」

The rapidly improved fortunes of the Ford Mustang from 1982 through 1986 mirrored those of Ford Motor Company itself. After teetering on the financial brink, [https://hotnews.com.ge/?p=6235 Prime Boosts Pills] Ford not only roared back to profitability, it became the most profitable outfit in Detroit. By 1987 it was earning more money each year than giant General Motors -- and on only half the sales volume. Critics were baffled, stockholders relieved, the automotive press impressed. There was no secret to this. Like Chrysler under Lee Iaccoca, Ford under Don Petersen (who moved up to chairman in 1985) became more efficient, closing old factories, modernizing others, [https://www.reddit.com/r/howto/search?q=slashing slashing] overhead, and laying off workers (only to rehire some later). But where Chrysler put all its chips on one basic platform, the adaptable K-car, Ford trotted out a slew of new models with much broader sales appeal.Part of that appeal stemmed from a new aerodynamic styling signature instigated by Jack Telnack. It proved so popular that he was promoted in mid-1987 to replace Don Kopka as design vice-president for the entire company. [https://englishwords.quora.com/Which-one-is-correct-please-see-details-below-or-please-see-below-details quora.com] And as CAFE standards were not going away, that was still vital in the 1980s. But shapes born of the wind tunnel also gave Ford a way to stand apart from the herd at a time when design -- good design -- was again influencing sales more than EPA mileage numbers.Sure enough, amidst a sea of mostly square-rigged Chrysler products and lookalike GM cars, buyers flocked to smooth, unmistakable new Dearborn offerings like the 1983 Thunderbird and especially the 1986 Ford Taurus and Mercury Sable, affordable midsize sedans that looked like pricey German Audis.But the key to Mustang's success in these years was performance, not styling. Of course, it helped greatly that an economic recovery took hold in 1982, boosting personal income even as inflation, interest rates, unemployment, and especially gas prices all came down. As we've seen, Ford also helped Mustang's cause with the same sort of relentless refining that Porsche used to keep its Sixties-era 911 sports car so evergreen. This not only involved more power almost every year but also new features and options, plus much improved workmanship.Yet the more things stay the same, the harder they can be to change, to paraphrase an old saw. Even as it got better and better, Mustang increasingly seemed a relic of Ford's past -- and ever more dated next to newer sporty cars. But sales were on the upswing, and [http://git.ybrsmfw.cn/valorieshepher/8921652/wiki/Personal-Trainer-new-York-City PrimeBoosts.com] nostalgia was a big factor, even for younger types who had missed "Mustang Mania" in the Sixties. Still, Ford fretted over what would happen to sales should the market suddenly reverse again or if competitors mounted a strong new challenge. With all this, Ford reasoned, a next-generation Mustang ought to appear by 1989 at the latest. In an unthinkable move, Ford originally sent the design duties outside of the country. On the next page, find out how the Mazda-designed car that became the Ford Probe almost wore a Mustang badge. Words and pictures tell only part of the Mustang story. For vehicle dimensions, engine data, annual sales figures, prices and other information, check out 1987-1993 Ford Mustang specifications. The 1968 Shelby Cobra GT 500-KR was no mere Mustang. Check out this muscle car profile, which includes photos and specifications. The 1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1 428 Cobra Jet was the muscle car Mustang fans had waited for. Gallop into its profile, photos, and specifications. To keep momentum going, they decided a redesign was in order for [https://piscinadiala.it/nuoto-master/ www.PrimeBoosts.com] the late '80s. As it happened, work toward that car had been underway since early 1982, just as the reborn GT and H.O. V-8 were starting to rekindle the old Mustang excitement. Initiated as project SN8 -- "sporty car, North America, 8" -- this effort envisioned a smaller, lighter pony like the old Mustang II or European Capri, but with aero styling, front-wheel drive to optimize interior space, and high-efficiency four-cylinder engines instead of a thirsty low-tech V-8.

Everything You’ve Ever Wanted To Know About Muscles

2025-08-06T16:09:17Z

VeolaOverlock: ページの作成:「 Breakthroughs, discoveries, and DIY tips sent every weekday. Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. This post has been updated. Whether or not you’ve resolved to get…」

Breakthroughs, discoveries, and DIY tips sent every weekday. Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. This post has been updated. Whether or not you’ve resolved to get into shape [https://pwpf.gr/eva-gallud-pwpf-2020/ Check this out] January, Muscle Month is here to teach you a thing or two about stretching, contracting, lifting, tearing, gaining, and so much more. Welcome to PopSci’s Muscle Month! We’re kicking off the season with an FAQ on all things muscle-related, based on popular internet searches and queries from members of our staff. Got a question we didn’t answer? Let us know on Twitter. What exactly is a muscle? Muscles form when specialized long and tubular cells, known as myocytes, band together in a process called myogenesis. These fibers are distributed throughout our bodies and [http://inprokorea.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=2062254 Prime Boosts Official] come in many different shapes, sizes, and forms, says David Putrino, a physical therapist at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York and director of Rehabilitation Innovation for the Mount Sinai Health System. The human body has three types of muscle cells: Skeletal, smooth, and cardiac. Smooth muscles line the inside of all our hollow organs like the intestines and the stomach. That’s except for the heart, which contains cardiac muscles (hence the name). Both cardiac and smooth muscles are involuntary, meaning we can’t tell them to tense or relax. Instead their movement is regulated by a precise neural dance formulated by our autonomic nervous system. The muscles that most of us are familiar with, says Putrino, are the skeletal muscles. They include well-known ones like the hamstrings, quadriceps, [https://plamosoku.com/enjyo/index.php?title=%E5%88%A9%E7%94%A8%E8%80%85:VeolaOverlock Prime Boosts Official] calves, and illusive external and internal obliques. So, just to clarify, is the heart an organ or a muscle? The heart is an organ, albeit a complex one. Again, it contains a distinct type of muscle called a cardiac muscle, which is only found in the heart, and makes up the main tissue within it, says Putrino. What about the brain? The brain is not a muscle at all. [https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch03.htm marxists.org] It’s an organ made up of neural tissue. However, you can still "work out" your brain, so to speak, to strengthen certain cognitive functioning, like memory and attention. Okay, so how many muscles do we have? And what’s the biggest one? What about the smallest? Approximately 639 muscles make up the human body. The aptly-named gluteus maximus is the largest one in the body. You can thank your gluteus maximus for a movement known as the hip extension which allows us humans to perform basic functions like walking and standing-as well as more extreme endeavours like running. The smallest muscle in the human body is the stapedius muscle, says Putrino. But never judge anything by its size: This tiny beast sits inside the ear and stabilizes the smallest bone in the body, the stapes, which is responsible for allowing us to hear the world around us. Speaking of tiny muscles, does it really take more muscles to frown than it does to smile? Of course everyone wants to think that it takes far more muscles to grimace than grin. But the truth is, no one has ever really done a study to prove it, says Putrino. It also depends on how you define a frown or a smile, he says. A deep frown will definitely take more muscles to pull off than a faint smile. But when it comes to a typical frown compared to a similarly average smile, it’s hard to say. Anecdotes asides, "I’m going to have to call myth on this one," Putrino says. What’s the most muscular animal? That’s a tough one, says Putrino. "If we’re talking about just strength, beetles are definitely the strongest animals in the world and gorillas are the strongest mammals." If we consider muscle mass, then snakes take the crown for having the highest muscle-to-body ratio. Taken another way, he says, elephants are thought to have the most individual muscles. And all animals have similar types of muscles, right?

利用者:VeolaOverlock

2025-08-06T16:08:18Z

VeolaOverlock: ページの作成:「I'm Son and I live in Sierne. I'm interested in Directing, Amateur geology and Vietnamese art. I like travelling and reading fantasy. Look at my webpage ... [h…」

I'm Son and I live in Sierne. I'm interested in Directing, Amateur geology and Vietnamese art. I like travelling and reading fantasy. Look at my webpage ... [http://inprokorea.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=2062254 Prime Boosts Official]