Nude Girl Vids Exposed

提供: 炎上まとめwiki
2022年10月30日 (日) 02:18時点における123.13.59.32 (トーク)による版 (ページの作成:「<br> 10. Don Ihde, Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990), 141. Subsequent references will be cited in the textu…」)
(差分) ← 古い版 | 最新版 (差分) | 新しい版 → (差分)
ナビゲーションに移動 検索に移動


10. Don Ihde, Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990), 141. Subsequent references will be cited in the textual content. nine. Michael Heim, Electric Language: A Philosophical Study of Word Processing (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1987), 152. Subsequent references will be cited in the textual content. Clearly the typewriter and the term processor are perhaps quicker than the pen and the pencil, at the very least for longhand. A journalist close friend of mine who hates desktops and just about normally prefers to publish with pencil or pen tells me that she feels not so significantly technologically challenged as temporally challenged by each electric and digital creating systems. Words become higher-lighted, vanish at the press of a button, then reappear instantly at will" in this "frictionless electric factor."9 (In this regard the callus on my finger also-and indelibly-reminds me that my body and the creating materials it engages are marked by distinctive levels of friction and resistance in the producing of the mark.



In this regard it is telling that the time period belles lettres first emerged involving 1630 and 1699, a period that marks the emergence of mechanical print culture. Although print has existed since the Gutenberg press, insofar as wide cultural understandings of producing by hand are concerned Thompson also factors out: "As late as the seventeenth century, gentlemen and gals hardly identified an association between an individual and his or her script. In purchase for this to take place, we, as a movement and as bisexual girls, to start with have to have to assert two simple understandings: very first, that girls have the correct to be sexual whenever and having said that they wish and second, that gals have the correct not be sexual whenever and on the other hand they want. No luxurious, but an abundance of these utensils is essential."4 And in an job interview entitled "Un rapport presque maniaque avec les devices graphique," Roland Barthes obsessed about his "problems in finding the suitable form of pen."5 For illustration, now that I use the computer for crafting something far more than notes or lists, contemplation of the "bumpy" callus on the third finger of my ideal hand fills me with a specific ponder. " Furthermore, Ihde notes how his "fascination with the precise appearance of the script, whose lettering could be very gorgeous in that the curves and varying scribing could attain aesthetic high quality," led him to a rediscovery of the "art" of that design of crafting we affiliate with belles lettres.10 Ihde describes and contrasts his individual many experiences with unique creating systems ("the dip ink pen, a typewriter and the term processor") within a broader thought of the phenomeno-logic of our embodied relations with, as he places it, "technologies-in-use." Although he emphasizes that systems (here, creating technologies) do not determine the subject’s intentional habits, he also emphasizes that systems are under no circumstances neutral, and consequently, to varying degrees, they advise our actions: "Technologies, by giving a framework for action, do kind intentionalities and inclinations inside which use-patterns choose dominant condition." Thus, he tells us: "I could not assert that the use of the dip pen ‘determined’ that I produce in the model of belles lettres, but the propensity or inclination was surely there" (141). Certainly, the purpose for composing is a cultural element in qualifying any stylistic probability or influence imposed by the specific materiality of creating.



Here, as Ihde mentioned of his inclination to compose belles lettres when he employed the dip pen, watch Free online porn the notion of existential design emerges-a fashion that "character-izes" the subject matter of creating as significantly as it does the created object. Unlike my upright posture at the typewriter or personal computer, when I wrote with pencil or pen, I commonly curled my system ahead toward the protecting halfcircle of my remaining arm-whether I was sitting down at a desk or desk, sprawling on floor or bed, or propped up with a pad resting from my knees, no matter whether I was dreamily crafting a poem or anxiously using a examination at faculty. It brings back again actual physical reminiscences from childhood and adolescence: of tightly gripping a pencil or pen, of writer’s cramp, of urgent into distinctive textures of paper to fulfill different sorts of reception and resistance. Thus, there is a tendency to write "long" on the personal computer, to get rid of sight (actually) of how numerous "pages" (product sheets of paper) there are-or must be-in relation to a offered venture. However, when I generate much more indelibly in ink, "committing" pen to paper (when do we ever use the term commit in relation to pencil, typewriter, or phrase processor?



I represent the enabling likelihood not only to bodily use but also to materially make the "fine place. " It is as nevertheless my ideas go by an enhanced process of discrimination and refinement so that they are able to emerge physically via the specific and refined materiality of the pen nib. Moving from pencil and pen to typewriter as my primary technological innovation, I wrote additional prose than poetry, and my prose turned relatively additional staccato. Is there some particular tale or incident you are talking about in the book that you have additional data about? Whatever specific factors of working experience are amplified or lessened through different writing systems, the point to be built listed here is that my existential model and my writing style are correlated-and insofar as I include diverse systems of writing I am also integrated by them. If print was the impersonal product of a equipment, then script became the creation of the hand, physically-and conceptually-linked to the human getting who produces it."13 Yet even so personal and nontechnological a make a difference as one’s own handwriting may possibly alter, along with one’s manner, in reaction to a unique producing technological innovation. As Tamara Plakins Thornton notes: "Only at this stage did script appear to be defined as distinct from print.