4
回編集
Reva503788840 (トーク | 投稿記録) 細 |
MartinIllingwort (トーク | 投稿記録) 細 |
||
| 1行目: | 1行目: | ||
<br> | <br>Unfortunately, her desire to snap Dutch out of his paranoia leads to a mistake that not only harms herself, but the Van der Linde gang as a whole. In Chapter 6 of Red Dead Redemption 2 she returns to camp still drunk from Saint Denis. She then begins berating Dutch, claiming that she isn't like " any of your stooges, " a reference to the gang's blind faith in Dutch. She eventually "admits" to ratting the gang out to the Pinkertons, a reveal that players later find out is a lie. While O'Shea likely told Dutch she ratted in a desperate attempt to anger him, or at the very least grab his attention, it ended up costing her her life. In addition, it protected the actual snitch, which lead to further misfortune for the rest of the gang. Despite being a sympathetic character, her final action hurt the people she cared the most ab<br><br> <br>Players will never look at rats the same way again after finishing both games. The authenticity of the game's setting makes the title feel engaging. Players who want a stealth-focused game set in France during a historical period will have a great time playing both A Plague Tale ga<br><br> <br>Unlike Williamson and Escuela, both of whom made more direct decisions that harmed the people around them, Molly was a victim of poor circumstance. O'Shea spends most of Red Dead Redemption 2 as the main love interest of Dutch van der Linde, but as the game progress players watch their relationship begin to deteriorate. Ad Dutch goes from a caring leader to a paranoid mess, Molly's attempts to connect and reason with him fail. Drifting away from Dutch, Molly becomes desperate in her attempts to win back his affect<br><br> <br>Even if someone did have a preference for one, a major barrier in justifying that preference comes in subjectivity. Both characters are extremely well written, so the choice between the two may have more to do with personal preference than objectivity. A close approximation to an objective indicator, however, is how a given character is designed to fulfill their purpose. In the case of Red Dead Redemption, that purpose is to allow the player [https://M.En.Blancdoux.com/member/login.html?returnUrl=https://gorod-Lugansk.ru/user/GenaKauffman0/ pop over to this web-site] live out the fantasy of a spaghetti-western cowboy character. So, whichever character in Red Dead Redemption allows the player to fulfill that fantasy more effectively could be deemed better than the ot<br> <br>The downside to being Arthur, however, is that those minute details are only fun to play through if the player wants a realistic depiction of the Old West . If they just want to cheat at poker, break horses, and put holes in people then they'll have to trudge through 10-15 minutes of excess time before anything interesting happens. Other systems, like Arthur's various cores, make it difficult to maintain these activities for extended periods of time. Keeping Arthur's cores up means participating in other, much slower activities (like hunting and crafting) that detract from the intense, cinematic violence many cowboy fans crave. Ironically in this case, more content means less fun for some play<br><br> <br>Rockstar has always had a knack for creating loveable, interesting protagonists for their games. The **Red Dead Redemption ** series is no exception, and with two amazingly crafted main characters, it's not easy to choose a favorite between the <br><br>Arthur is then sent into a mine full of poisonous gas, and someone tries to kill him. It's revealed that the shaman was actually working for a fuel company who's been poisoning the land to get the people of Butcher's Creek to sell their land, and Arthur has to force the man to admit what he's done. Obediah and the others still believe it all to be a curse though, but they thank Arthur for his help.<br><br> <br>The leader of the Van der Linde gang and Arthur's surrogate father, Dutch begins Red Dead Redemption 2 as a likable and trustworthy man, one who clearly puts his gang first and fights for what he believes is right. Even when Dutch does do unexpected things, such as putting the gang at risk to help Eagle Flies, it is ideologically consistent with his belief in a free country for all. As the gang becomes more desperate, however, Dutch seemingly stops putting the group first, leaving people behind and trusting people like Micah for advice . When Dutch eventually turns on Arthur and John, it demonstrates just how unstable he had actually bec<br><br> <br>This is also fairly evident in his gameplay. Arthur can do all the same activities available to John in the first Red Dead Redemption plus more. Furthermore, many of the activities included in both games are much more realistically detailed in the sequel. In Red Dead Redemption 2, players have to clean their guns, feed their horse, and keep in mind whether they are downwind from any prey they are hunting . Assuming the player wants to fulfill a semi-accurate fantasy about the trials of being an Old West outlaw, then playing as Arthur Morgan is definitely the way to<br><br> <br>In the end, Arthur has a wider variety of Old West activities for the player to engage in when living out that cowboy fantasy. He isn't pigeon-holed by the narrative into being a morally justified character, and the player has more ability to customize him to fulfill any Old West fantasy they choose. They can be heroic gunman or a mountain-dwelling survivalist like Jeremiah Johnson. He is simply more versat<br> | ||
回編集