「RDR2: Is Arthur Morgan Or Red Dead Redemption s John Marston Better」の版間の差分

Rockstar has always had a knack for creating loveable, interesting protagonists for their games. The **Red Dead Redemption ** series is no exception, and with two amazingly crafted main characters, it's not easy to choose a favorite between the <br><br>This one brings Arthur Morgan into conflict with the Night Folk, a faction of serial killers with voodoo influence. They set traps in the swamps, often stringing up other dead bodies to use as bait. "A Fine Night for It" teams Arthur with a Cajun man looking to hunt the Night Folk and retake his homestead. This one is particularly strange due to how unnerving the Night Folk and their macabre practices are.<br><br><br>The main problem with selecting the superior Red Dead protagonist is that both of them share similar values as characters while serving similar roles within their stories. Both John and Arthur are motivated by their sense of loyalty and responsibility to a family, and as rough-cut, grit-lined cowboys it's their job to use whatever means necessary to secure their family's well being. They're cut from the same cloth, and it's pretty clear that this was an intentional decision from Rockstar, as John Marston and Arthur Morgan each serve as members of the same family for much of their lives. As such, they even influence each others' characterization throughout the games. In the end, if a person likes one of them, there's a good chance they'll feel a similar way about the ot<br><br><br>Players will never look at rats the same way again after finishing both games. The authenticity of the game's setting makes the title feel engaging. Players who want a stealth-focused game set in France during a historical period will have a great time playing both A Plague Tale ga<br><br>RDR2 allows for plenty of exploration, including side missions. According to Tech Crunch , the game does not follow a linear storyline. This allows players to basically do what they want. You'll get to experience the Wild West in all its outlaw glory.<br><br><br>The characters who failed to find redemption are those who became consumed with greed or paranoia, disregarding those around them for their own selfish benefits. Listed below are their unfortunate ta<br><br><br>For new players, the reveal of an Honor Meter might strongly dictate the ethical code that they follow once they gain access to the open world. However, players shouldn’t be intimidated by virtual morality in Red Dead Redemption 2 , especially since the story will make it quite clear when it’s time for redemption or damnat<br><br>To get to this Stranger Mission, you will need to pass Chapter 4's "The Joys of Civilization," according to the guide on Yekbot . There are a lot of moving parts in this quest , but Arthur is certainly up to the task. You will need to follow instructions on a letter to collect some moonshine, which is on a wagon. You have to take out all the guards then bring the wagon back to the professor. The next step of this mission is a bounty. The man's name is McDaniels, and you have to take him and all of his friends out of commission. By the end of the mission, you should have obtained the professor's blueprints for his invention of the electric chair.<br><br><br>Unfortunately, her desire to snap Dutch out of his paranoia leads to a mistake that not only harms herself, but the Van der Linde gang as a whole. In Chapter 6 of Red Dead Redemption 2 she returns to camp still drunk from Saint Denis. She then begins berating Dutch, claiming that she isn't like " any of your stooges, " a reference to the gang's blind faith in Dutch. She eventually "admits" to ratting the gang out to the Pinkertons, a reveal that players later find out is a lie. While O'Shea likely told Dutch she ratted in a desperate attempt to anger him, or at the very least grab his attention, it ended up costing her her life. In addition, it protected the actual snitch, which lead to further misfortune for the rest of the gang. Despite being a sympathetic character, her final action hurt the people she cared the most ab<br><br><br>The Brothers In Arms series offers historical accuracy with its world design, character models, and tactical gameplay. Impressively, the aforementioned first game was used in a History Channel documentary to depict the invasion of Normandy. Unfortunately, the series has seemingly come to an end now, following the cancelation of Brothers in Arms: Furious 4 in 2<br><br><br>Arthur's character is a bit more original when it comes to his design, but he still feels like he belongs in the homage-riddled world of [https://tandme.co.uk/author/tamie77s831/ Red dead redemption 2 multiplayer] Dead Redemption. __ His design is more suited to a variety of cowboy activities, and his story in Red Dead Redemption 2 provides more room for a player to feel morally safe when doing dirty deeds. Player's have more control over his appearance, what he does, and what he says to other characters, so outside of roleplaying Clint Eastwood, Arthur is a more effective avatar than John ever <br><br><br>John, however, is much more effective at fulfilling one specific archetypal role within Western fiction, meaning that though Arthur serves a wider variety of purposes, John Marston is still superior depending on who is making the decision. Subjectivity, then, cannot be entirely excluded from the situation. However, if one had to recommend one of **Red Dead Redemption ** 's __ two protagonists under the pretense that they might fulfill a particular fantasy, then the safest recommendation would be for Arthur. His versatility means that even if a player wants to be a good cowboy or The Man With No Name, then Arthur can still fill that role for them. He may not be able to do it as well as John, but the player will still leave the game feeling as if their Western fantasies had been fulfil