20
回編集
JudsonHibbs7 (トーク | 投稿記録) 細 |
AXOCyril8666293 (トーク | 投稿記録) 細 |
||
| 1行目: | 1行目: | ||
<br> | <br>Rockstar has always had a knack for creating loveable, interesting protagonists for their games. The **[http://soft-cr.org/terms/?from=http%3A%2F%2FUnpop.net%2Fblog%2Fmember.asp%3Faction%3Dview%26memName%3DEzraHaffner12807 Red Dead Redemption 2 updates] Dead Redemption ** series is no exception, and with two amazingly crafted main characters, it's not easy to choose a favorite between the <br><br> <br>From a game set just after World War II to a franchise set in the heart of it, the Brothers In Arms series began in 2005 with the critically acclaimed Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30 , which was the first of nine games from the franch<br><br> <br>There aren't many great Western games out there, so fans of the genre should definitely check out the Red Dead Redemption series. The second game serves as a prequel, and its in-depth mechanics are an absolute joy to experie<br><br> <br>Unlike Williamson and Escuela, both of whom made more direct decisions that harmed the people around them, Molly was a victim of poor circumstance. O'Shea spends most of Red Dead Redemption 2 as the main love interest of Dutch van der Linde, but as the game progress players watch their relationship begin to deteriorate. Ad Dutch goes from a caring leader to a paranoid mess, Molly's attempts to connect and reason with him fail. Drifting away from Dutch, Molly becomes desperate in her attempts to win back his affect<br><br> <br>In the end, Arthur has a wider variety of Old West activities for the player to engage in when living out that cowboy fantasy. He isn't pigeon-holed by the narrative into being a morally justified character, and the player has more ability to customize him to fulfill any Old West fantasy they choose. They can be heroic gunman or a mountain-dwelling survivalist like Jeremiah Johnson. He is simply more versat<br><br> <br>Iconography is John's biggest ally when measured up against his successor. He was designed specifically to resemble Clint Eastwood's character, "The Man With No Name" from famous movies such as The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly . Everything from John's outfit to the gun on his belt is a screaming homage meant to please fans of old Western movies. These fans will also find themselves performing the same tasks as that archetypal character. Bounty hunting and gunfighting are at the crux of Red Dead Redemption' s setting and story, so there are plenty of opportunities for players to step in the shoes of Eastwood. If players are looking to replicate that character and his style, then John is a good cho<br><br>You will have to go down his list and collect the things he wants, bring the items back to him and start on another quest. Algernon Wasp will give you five of these quests to complete. You get something out of it, though. A reward of $760, a hat and a revolver can do a whole lot of good for an outlaw in the Wild West .<br><br> <br>Even AAA titles like the Assassins Creed series now actively encourage gamers to learn more about the eras that they are playing in, predominantly through adding notes or diary entries as collectibles. Regardless of what kind of genre players may like when it comes to their favorite games, they can rest assured of the fact that these games are as entertaining as they come while giving players a tantalizing glimpse into history and its various notable eve<br><br> <br>The characters who failed to find redemption are those who became consumed with greed or paranoia, disregarding those around them for their own selfish benefits. Listed below are their unfortunate ta<br><br> <br>The main problem with selecting the superior Red Dead protagonist is that both of them share similar values as characters while serving similar roles within their stories. Both John and Arthur are motivated by their sense of loyalty and responsibility to a family, and as rough-cut, grit-lined cowboys it's their job to use whatever means necessary to secure their family's well being. They're cut from the same cloth, and it's pretty clear that this was an intentional decision from Rockstar, as John Marston and Arthur Morgan each serve as members of the same family for much of their lives. As such, they even influence each others' characterization throughout the games. In the end, if a person likes one of them, there's a good chance they'll feel a similar way about the ot<br><br> <br>John, however, is much more effective at fulfilling one specific archetypal role within Western fiction, meaning that though Arthur serves a wider variety of purposes, John Marston is still superior depending on who is making the decision. Subjectivity, then, cannot be entirely excluded from the situation. However, if one had to recommend one of **Red Dead Redemption ** 's __ two protagonists under the pretense that they might fulfill a particular fantasy, then the safest recommendation would be for Arthur. His versatility means that even if a player wants to be a good cowboy or The Man With No Name, then Arthur can still fill that role for them. He may not be able to do it as well as John, but the player will still leave the game feeling as if their Western fantasies had been fulfil<br><br> <br>The entirety of the Red Dead Redemption _ franchise revolves around flawed characters trying to change their ways, starting in the original game with John Marston and following up with Arthur Morgan in Red Dead Redemption 2 . _ Even though those two protagonists have both meaningfully changed by the end of their storylines, there are many characters in the Red Dead Redemption games who are never able to make up for their p<br> | ||
回編集