20
回編集
AXOCyril8666293 (トーク | 投稿記録) 細 |
AXOCyril8666293 (トーク | 投稿記録) 細 |
||
| 1行目: | 1行目: | ||
<br> | <br>This is also fairly evident in his gameplay. Arthur can do all the same activities available to John in the first Red Dead Redemption plus more. Furthermore, many of the activities included in both games are much more realistically detailed in the sequel. In Red Dead Redemption 2, players have to clean their guns, feed their horse, and keep in mind whether they are downwind from any prey they are hunting . Assuming the player wants to fulfill a semi-accurate fantasy about the trials of being an Old West outlaw, then playing as Arthur Morgan is definitely the way to<br><br>**Updated on October 9th, 2020 by Josh Davison : ** We are nearing two years since the release of Red Dead Redemption 2 at the time of writing, and gamers are still talking about the game. Between the immersive world, engaging missions, lovable characters, and absorbing online mode, there is a lot to still love about RDR2. Side missions, aka Stranger Missions, are a big part of what makes Red Dead Redemption 2 so good, and they can be downright strange for certain. While the world of the game is often very grounded, the side missions are where the game feels free to get a little freaky. With all of that in mind, it seems like an excellent time to dive back into the weirdest side missions in Red Dead Redemption 2 with an additional five entries to the list.<br><br> <br>There's something about realistic military shooters that makes them so much fun to play through. Hell Let Loose quickly became one of the most popular games in this department because of its strategic gameplay and massive-scale battles. Hell Let Loose is a game that takes no prisoners, forcing players to accept the fact that being a one-man army is a surefire way to guarantee their dem<br><br> <br>In the end, Arthur has a wider variety of Old West activities for the player to engage in when living out that cowboy fantasy. He isn't pigeon-holed by the narrative into being a morally justified character, and the player has more ability to customize him to fulfill any Old West fantasy they choose. They can be heroic gunman or a mountain-dwelling survivalist like Jeremiah Johnson. He is simply more versat<br><br>Arthur is then sent into a mine full of poisonous gas, and someone tries to kill him. It's revealed that the shaman was actually working for a fuel company who's been poisoning the land to get the people of Butcher's Creek to sell their land, and Arthur has to force the man to admit what he's done. Obediah and the others still believe it all to be a curse though, but they thank Arthur for his help.<br><br> <br>Arthur's character is a bit more original when it comes to his design, but he still feels like he belongs in the homage-riddled world of Red Dead Redemption. __ His design is more suited to a variety of cowboy activities, and his story in Red Dead Redemption 2 provides more room for a player to feel morally safe when doing dirty deeds. Player's have more control over his appearance, what he does, and what he says to other characters, so outside of roleplaying Clint Eastwood, Arthur is a more effective avatar than John ever <br><br> <br>John is not without his downsides, however. Because the sequel is much larger and robust than its predecessor, John has less to do in his own game. This is completely remedied in Red Dead Redemption 2 once the player takes control of John, but for the majority of a player's time with the character they just have less options. In a series made to display every aspect of a cowboy's life, John's game fails to deliver in the more mundanely detailed challenges of the Old W<br><br> <br>John, however, is much more effective at fulfilling one specific archetypal role within Western fiction, meaning that though Arthur serves a wider variety of purposes, John Marston is still superior depending on who is making the decision. Subjectivity, then, cannot be entirely excluded from the situation. However, if one had to recommend one of **Red Dead Redemption ** 's __ two protagonists under the pretense that they might fulfill a particular fantasy, then the safest recommendation would be for Arthur. His versatility means that even if a player wants to be a good cowboy or The Man With No Name, then Arthur can still fill that role for them. He may not be able to do it as well as John, but the player will still leave the game feeling as if their Western fantasies had been fulfil<br><br> <br>After missions and random events, Arthur will often jot down a few thoughts in his journal. While Arthur might narrate some of these moments, there are entire pieces of written content that are never heard, so if players don’t go back and read his journal, they’re missing out on some beautiful thoughts from Arthur , along with his artistic tale<br><br> <br>The leader of the Van der Linde gang and Arthur's surrogate father, Dutch begins [http://forum.dirty-dozen.de/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&u=17166 Red Dead Redemption 2 horses] Dead Redemption 2 as a likable and trustworthy man, one who clearly puts his gang first and fights for what he believes is right. Even when Dutch does do unexpected things, such as putting the gang at risk to help Eagle Flies, it is ideologically consistent with his belief in a free country for all. As the gang becomes more desperate, however, Dutch seemingly stops putting the group first, leaving people behind and trusting people like Micah for advice . When Dutch eventually turns on Arthur and John, it demonstrates just how unstable he had actually bec<br> | ||
回編集