The Issue Of Neon Signs: An Old Parliamentary Debate Worth Revisiting

It’s not often that one comes across a debate of such interest, but I recently had the pleasure of revisiting a particularly intriguing discussion from 1930, which took place in the House of Commons. The subject? The growing issue of neon signage—specifically those red and green ones outside shops and factories situated near major roadways. At the time, these signs were causing a considerable amount of confusion for motorists. Why? Because they were so strikingly similar to the automatic traffic signals that motorists used to guide them.

This sparked a heated debate, where Captain Hudson, the Minister of Transport at the time, pointed out the powers granted under Section 48 (4) of the Road Traffic Act, 1930. Under this provision, local authorities had the right to demand the removal of any sign or object that could be confused with a traffic light. In theory, this would prevent the confusion caused by neon signs in areas near busy roads.

However, as you can imagine, the matter was not as straightforward as it appeared. In the House, Captain Sir William Brass raised a good question: "Who exactly decides what counts as a problem?" he inquired. To this, Captain Hudson responded that it would be up to the highway authority's decision to make that determination. This raised the question of consistency—would there be uniformity in how different areas of the country handled this issue? Mr. Morgan Jones, ever the inquiring mind, then asked whether the Ministry of Transport had had enough data on this particular issue.

After all, with the rise of electric lighting, surely the Ministry should have data and a policy in place to deal with the confusion caused by these bright signs. Captain Hudson, in a polite yet firm response, reiterated that this matter was not within the direct remit of the Ministry. He insisted that it was for the councils to take the appropriate action, and that his superior was already looking into it. Yet, Mr. Jones raised another question: should not the Minister of Transport take a more active role in ensuring consistency?

This is where the debate really became interesting—should it be left to local authorities to address it, or should the Minister step in to ensure a cohesive, nationwide solution to a problem that seemed to be causing growing confusion? Ultimately, Captain Hudson admitted that the matter was indeed causing confusion, though he deferred to the Ministry’s internal discussions for a more clear response. He suggested that the situation would be closely reviewed, but as yet, no firm action had been taken.

What is most striking about this debate, looking back, is how such a seemingly small issue—neon signs—could become such an important topic in Parliament. While today we may take these kinds of discussions for granted, it was a time when new technology—even something as simple as new signage—could create ripple effects across society.

If you have any kind of inquiries relating to where and how you can utilize BrightGlow Signs, you can contact us at our site.